团队合作的舒适护理对妇科腹腔镜术后疼痛及舒适度的影响

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:DK7531672
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨团队合作的舒适护理对妇科腹腔镜术后出现疼痛及舒适度的影响?方法选择2019年3月至2020年10月在我院实施妇科腹腔镜术的患者205例,选取2019年3月至2019年12月行腹腔镜手术的102例患者为对照组,2020年1~10月行腹腔镜手术的103 例 患者为观察组?对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予舒适护理,比较两组疼痛评分?疼痛程度及舒适度?结果 对照组患者术后疼痛评分为(5.12±0.32)分,观察组患者术后疼痛评分为(4.53±0.24)分,观察组患者术后疼痛评分低于对照组(t=14.943“,”Objective To explore the effect of teamwork comfort nursing on pain and comfort after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods 205 patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecological surgery in our hospital from March 2019 to October 2020 were selected, 102 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery from March 2019 to December 2019 were selected as the control group, and 103 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery from January 2020 to October 2020 were selected as the observation group. The control group was given routine nursing, the observation group was given comfort nursing, pain score, pain degree and comfort were compared between the two groups. Results The postoperative pain score was (5.12±0.32) points in the control group and (4.53±0.24) points in the observation group. the difference was statistically signi?cant, and the postoperative pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (t=14.943, P<0.001). The postoperative pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (Z=3.784, P<0.001),the difference was statistically signi?cant. The comfort scores of the observation group were higher than the control group in the four dimensions of physiology, psychology, society, culture and environment (P<0.05). Conclusion The comfortable nursing mode based on teamwork can reduce the postoperative pain of patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery, improve the comfort of patients, and is suitable for clinical laparoscopic surgery patients.
其他文献
目的 探讨急性胃炎采用阿托品联合奥美拉唑治疗的效果?方法将我院2018年4月至2019年9月急性胃炎患者100例,随机分组,山莨菪碱+奥美拉唑治疗组就诊患者采取山莨菪碱+奥美拉唑治疗,阿托品+ 奥美拉唑治疗组对本次就诊患者采取阿托品+ 奥美拉唑治疗?比较两组急性胃炎疗效;泛酸症状消失的时间?上腹疼痛消失的时间;治疗前后患者平均胃动素监测水平?胃泌素监测水平?胃炎炎性分子;不良反应?结果 阿托品+ 奥美拉唑治疗组急性胃炎疗效高于山莨菪碱+ 奥美拉唑治疗组,P <0.05?阿托品+ 奥美拉唑治疗组泛酸症状消失
目的 探究综合护理用于带状疱疹后遗神经痛患者中的效果?方法选取98例我院于2018年4月至2019年2月收治的带状疱症后遗神经痛患者为研究对象?按照摸球法将以上患者分为A组与B组?患者一般资料无统计学意义(P > 0.05),有可比性?给予A组患者综合护理,给予B组患者常规护理?对比两组患者护理1个月后护理满意评分?不良事件发生情况?VAS评分?神经功能缺损评分?睡眠质量评分及护理前后精神健康评分?结果A组护理满意评分(91.26±1.51)分,高于B 组的(72.39±1.57)分,对比有统计学意义(P