论文部分内容阅读
利益冲突规则在律师执业过程中是一个重要而复杂的问题。由于法学教材可以反映一国法治的理论和实践在特定问题上的基本观点,所以通过中美两国所使用的主要法学教材可以对利益冲突规则进行整体上的比较研究。两种教材在该规则的内涵和意义上形成了共识,但是,在具体分类及其操作层面则有很多不同。本文指出通过这种比较研究可以弥补利益冲突规则在我国法律规定中的欠缺,对完善法律实践和高校法学教育具有一定意义。
Conflicts of interest rules are an important and complex issue in the practice of lawyers. Because the law textbooks can reflect the basic viewpoints on the specific issues of the theory and practice of the rule of law in a country, the comparative study of the rules of conflict of interest can be conducted through the main legal textbooks used in China and the United States. Both texts have reached a consensus on the connotation and meaning of the rule, but there are many differences between the specific classification and its operational aspects. This paper points out that this kind of comparative study can make up for the lack of conflict of interest rules in our country’s legal provisions and has some significance to improve the legal practice and law education in colleges and universities.