论文部分内容阅读
目的对重型脑外伤脑疝应用脑疝复位天幕切开和常规手术治疗的治疗效果进行比较。方法 80例重型脑外伤脑疝患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,各40例。对照组给予常规去骨瓣开颅治疗,实验组在对照组治疗基础上给予脑疝复位天幕切开术治疗。比较两组的治疗效果。结果术后实验组预后情况优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组术后并发症发生率7.50%低于对照组20.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论治疗重型脑外伤脑疝,采用脑疝复位天幕切开术,提高了患者的治疗效果,降低了患者手术后的并发症发生率,值得推广。
Objective To compare the curative effect of cerebral hernia with cerebral hernia treated by retro-mastectomy and conventional surgical treatment. Methods Eighty patients with severe traumatic brain herniation were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 40 cases each. The control group was given conventional craniotomy, and the experimental group was treated with the treatment of cerebral hernia replacement masonry on the basis of the control group. Compare the treatment effect of two groups. Results The postoperative prognosis of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 7.50% in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (20.00%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05) . Conclusion The treatment of severe brain traumatic brain hernia, the use of brain hernia reset canopy surgery to improve the therapeutic effect of patients and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, it is worth promoting.