论文部分内容阅读
当曹军庆警惕复现、临摹局部现实得到的很可能是虚伪的真实时,并不意味着他与余华式的先锋写作分享具有一致性的观念,差别其实非常明显。余华怀疑植根于生活现实的常识与经验,以精神的真实否定生活的真实或者说确定生活的不真实。由对常识的怀疑出发而逐渐生成、不断壮大的那种将精神与经验、思想与存在二分并对立的思维方式主宰了作家的叙事选择,斩断主客体统一性的决绝赋予了作家突破事实框架、重新结构世界的自由,以及让
When Cao Junqing is alert to the recurrence of reality, it is quite obvious that the copying of local reality may most probably be hypocritical truth when it does not mean that he shares the concept of consistency with Yuhua’s pioneer writing. Yu Hua suspiciously rooted in the common reality and experience of life, to the true negation of the true spirit of life or to determine the true life. The thinking mode of dividing and contradicting the spirit, the experience, the thought and the existence, which gradually emerges from the suspicion of common sense, dominates the author’s narrative choice and sever the unity of the subject and the object, giving the writer a breakthrough fact frame The freedom to reconstruct the world, and letting go