论文部分内容阅读
速裁程序因“快审快结、简易灵活”的特点,已经成为我国法院推行的新型简易民事案件审判方式,其在“提效率、减诉累”方面的作用不可忽视。但是基于我国司法实践,“速裁程序”逐渐显现出各种制约问题,抑制了其活力进一步的释放,如送达难、加速流水线带来突增审判压力、司法工作人员和当事人的诉累失衡以及矛盾激化等。本文针对这些问题提供相应的意见和建议,以期促进“速裁”程序的进一步推广和发展。
The speed arbitration procedure has become the new simple civil case trial method promoted by the courts in our country due to the characteristic of “quick adjudication and quick adjudication, quickness and flexibility”. Its role in “improving efficiency and reducing appeals” can not be ignored. However, based on the practice of our country’s judiciary, various kinds of restraint problems have been gradually revealed in the judicial proceedings and the further release of its vitality has been restrained. For instance, it is difficult to serve hardships, speeding up the pressure of sudden upsurge of trial on the assembly line, judicial staff and parties’ complaints Tired imbalances and intensified conflicts. This article provides corresponding opinions and suggestions on these issues, with a view to promoting the further promotion and development of the “quick cut” process.