论文部分内容阅读
华厦实业有限公司兴建的华荣大厦与新华日报社大楼毗邻,在其施工中,新华日报社发现其印刷厂厂房开裂、设备受损并危及人身安全。新华日报社委托有关单位鉴定认为,华荣大厦基础施工大量抽排地下水是造成厂房和设备受损的直接原因,遂于1994年6月30日起诉。 1994年11月,江苏省高级人民法院一审判决被告方败诉,赔偿新华日报社各项经济损失13883580.28元,并承担诉讼费79428元、诉讼保全费70520元。被告不服判决,上诉至最高人民法院,请求撤销一审判决。 在上诉中,印刷厂厂房的设计、施工是否符合有关规范与要求成为双方诉讼的焦点。对此,原被告双方以及受最高院之托的江苏省高院多次派员到南京市城建
Huarong Building, built by Huaxia Industrial Co., Ltd., is adjacent to the Xinhua Daily News Building. In its construction, Xinhua Daily discovers that its printing plant is cracked, its equipment damaged and endangering personal safety. Xinhua Daily commissioned the appraisal of the relevant agencies that Huarong Building, a large number of underground pumping of groundwater drainage is the direct cause of damage to plant and equipment, then in June 30, 1994 prosecution. In November 1994, the Higher People’s Court of Jiangsu Province ruled in the first instance that the defendant failed to defend the litigation, compensating the Xinhua Daily with all the economic losses of 13,883,580.28 yuan and assuming 79,428 yuan of litigation fees and 70520 yuan of litigation preservation fees. The defendant refused to accept the verdict and appealed to the Supreme People’s Court for a revocation of the judgment of first instance. In the appeal, the printing plant design, construction meets the relevant norms and requirements to become the focus of both litigation. In this regard, both the original defendants and the Supreme People’s Court of Jiangsu Provincial High Court dispatched several times to the urban construction in Nanjing