Duopa治疗帕金森病晚期患者的运动障碍及异动症的效果观察

来源 :中国临床研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:xtzzll
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨卡比多巴/肠内混悬药物左旋多巴(Duopa)治疗帕金森病晚期患者的运动障碍及异动症的效果。方法选取2015年2月至2016年2月中国医科大学附属盛京医院收治的126例帕金森病晚期患者,将其随机分为对照组(n=64)及观察组(n=62),对照组在对照组基础上采取多巴丝肼治疗,观察组采取Duopa治疗,两组患者的治疗周期均为12周,以统一帕金森评定量表(UPDRS)评价两组患者的临床疗效,同时监测患者的血常规、肝肾功能,观察患者的不良反应,比较两组药物治疗的安全性。结果治疗前,两组患者的UPDRSⅡ~Ⅳ各量表评分比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);治疗后,两组患者的UPDRSⅡ~Ⅳ各量表评分比较均明显低于治疗前,且观察组明显低于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。观察组患者剂末现象(93.55%vs 43.75%)、剂量高峰多动症(92.00%vs 42.32%)、开-关现象(91.42%vs 47.22%)、晨僵(93.75%vs 51.52%)、异动症(93.33%vs46.67%)、运动障碍(91.67%vs 45.45%)的总有效率均明显高于对照组(P<0.01,P<0.05)。治疗期间,观察组出现便秘1例,恶心2例,总药物不良反应发生率为4.84%(3/62);对照组出现便秘2例,恶心1例,总药物不良反应发生率为4.69%(3/64);两组患者的不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 Duopa能有效缓解帕金森病晚期患者的运动障碍及异动症,临床疗效确切,不良反应少。 Objective To investigate the effect of carbidopa / enteral suspension drug levodopa on dyskinesia and dyskinesia in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. Methods A total of 126 patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease who were admitted to Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from February 2015 to February 2016 were randomly divided into control group (n = 64) and observation group (n = 62) The patients in the observation group received Duopa’s hydrazide treatment. The treatment group was treated with Duopa for 12 weeks. The UPDRS was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients while monitoring The patient’s blood, liver and kidney function, adverse reactions observed in patients, compared the safety of two groups of drug treatment. Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference in UPDRS Ⅱ ~ Ⅳ scores between the two groups (all P> 0.05). After treatment, UPDRSⅡ ~ Ⅳ scores in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, And the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (P <0.05, P <0.01). (93.55% vs 43.75%), ADHD (92.00% vs 42.32%), ON-OFF (91.42% vs 47.22%), morning stiffness (93.75% vs 51.52% 93.33% vs46.67%). The total effective rate of dyskinesia (91.67% vs 45.45%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.01, P <0.05). During the treatment, constipation was observed in 1 case, nausea in 2 cases and total adverse drug reaction in 4.84% (3/62) in the observation group. In the control group, constipation was found in 2 cases and nausea in 1 case. The total adverse drug reaction rate was 4.69% 3/64). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion Duopa can effectively relieve dyskinesia and dyskinesia in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. The clinical effect is exact and there are few adverse reactions.
其他文献
目的分析一例输入性三日疟病例的实验室检测确诊病例。方法对病例的流行病学病史作回顾分析,采集血样作血涂片镜检和疟疾快速诊断(RDT),由浙江省疾病预防控制中心通过巢式PCR
目的验证乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原(HBsAg)酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)试剂盒的分析性能。方法参照美国临床实验室标准化研究所(CLSI)EP5-A2文件、第四版《全国临床检验操作规程》及