论文部分内容阅读
马凯同志:12月6日大函及两篇文章早已拜读,其中谈格律诗的文章内容丰富,引发我思考关于诗歌的许多问题,一直没有动笔回信,是因为有些问题没有想清楚,还想深入想一想,拖到现在,很抱歉。您的谈格律诗的文章,逻辑谨严,层次清晰,论断周密,分寸把握也极好。现在一些专门学者的论文也未必能达到这种地步(当然我的视野有限)。尤其文中把格律诗的无比美妙和无穷魅力和汉字的优势联在一起,这一点我十分赞同。而且我认为这一点可以从理论上更充分地展开论述,从
Comrade Ma Kai: The Great Letter of December 6 and two articles have been read since then. Among them, the articles on metrical poetry are rich in content, causing me to ponder over many problems concerning poetry. I have not written an e-mail because some problems are not clearly understood and I still want to go deep Think about it, till now, I’m sorry. Your articles on metrical poetry, cautious logic, a clear hierarchy, well-thought-out, measured grasping is also very good. Now some experts and scholars papers may not be able to achieve this point (of course, my vision is limited). In particular, I strongly agree with the incomparable wonderfulness and charm of metrical poems and the advantages of Chinese characters. And I think this can be more fully discussed in theory, from