论文部分内容阅读
(接上期)批评与共谋仿真画和商品雕塑,或许已经展示了艺术在商品符号的政治经济之中业已改变的地位。但是关于这种地位,它们并不是去讨论在一种交换商品的艺术经济和一种流通符号的政治经济之间的矛盾,而是倾向于参与那方程式的两边——保留艺术的美学范畴和社会特性,即便它们指向的是在这种新的交换秩序之中原本由高级与低级形式组成的结构的坍塌。从这个意义上说,它们是鱼与熊掌兼得的:它们将绘画的内容当作符号来利
(Continued) Criticizing and conspiring with simulated paintings and merchandise sculptures may have demonstrated the changing position of art in the political economy of the commodity symbol. But in this position, instead of discussing the contradiction between the art economy of a commodity exchange and a symbolic political economy, they tend to be involved in both sides of the equation - preserving the aesthetic category of the arts and society Traits, even if they point to the collapse of a structure originally composed of high and low forms among this new exchange order. In this sense, they are a combination of fish and bear’s paw: they treat the content of paintings as symbols