论文部分内容阅读
有关隐喻认知研究的一个核心问题是:隐喻加工机制与一般言语理解相比是否具有独特性以及隐喻理解伴随的神经生理机制是否有其独特的模式?对此问题的回答需要对隐喻性质进行区分。常见的熟悉隐喻可进一步区分为词源性隐喻与引发性隐喻,其中词源性隐喻的隐喻义属于词语多个词义中的一个延伸义,而引发性隐喻则是将两个分属于不同概念领域的概念进行非字面的语义联结。词源性隐喻句和引发性隐喻句的理解包含了与一般语义句理解不同的加工内容。相比一般句,词源性隐喻句特异性地激活了与语义竞争相关的左侧颞中回、颞上回以及与加工深度有关的额下回,而引发性隐喻句则在左侧额下回有更多激活。隐喻的内在加工过程和神经机制并不单一,探讨隐喻理解与一般语义理解的异同需要考虑具体的隐喻性质。
A key question about metaphorical cognitive research is: Does the metaphorical processing mechanism have distinctiveness in comparison with general speech comprehension and does the metaphorical understanding of the accompanying neurophysiological mechanisms have their unique patterns? The answer to this question needs to be distinguished from the metaphorical nature . Common familiar metaphors can be further divided into etymological metaphor and provocative metaphor, in which the metaphorical meaning of etymological metaphor belongs to one of the multiple meanings of lexical meanings, and the primal metaphor refers to the two conceptual categories The concept of non-literal semantic association. The comprehension of etymological metaphorical sentences and primed metaphorical sentences involves processing that differs from general semantic sentence understanding. Compared with the common sentence, the etymological metaphorical sentence specifically activates the left temporal gyrus, the superior temporal gyrus, and the inferior frontal gyrus related to the semantic competition, whereas the introductory metaphorical sentence in the left inferior frontal Back to more activation. The internal processing and neural mechanism of metaphor are not simple. To explore the similarities and differences between metaphor understanding and general semantic understanding need to consider the concrete metaphorical nature.