论文部分内容阅读
物权请求权是否适用诉讼时效制度是学者们长期以来争议的一个焦点问题。在这个问题上也形成了不同的学说和主张,而且在大陆法系诸多著名的民法典当中也有不同的规定。这些学说、主张和立法体例使得这一问题更加扑朔迷离。要弄清这一问题,不但要从对物权请求权的性质和诉讼时效的价值追求的认识入手,综合分析各国的立法及学者的观点,而且更应当根据不同类型的物权请求自身的特性入手,使问题细化并得到最终的解决。
Whether the right of remuneration suits the system of limitation of action is a long-standing dispute among scholars. Different theories and ideas have also been formed on this issue, and there are also different provisions in many famous civil codes of the civil law system. These doctrines, opinions and legislative systems make this issue more complicated and confusing. To clarify this issue, we should not only start with the understanding of the nature of the right to claim and the value pursuit of limitation of action, and comprehensively analyze the legislation and scholars’ opinions in different countries, but also request their own characteristics according to the different types of property rights Start, refine the problem and get the final solution.