In the current dialogue of “science and religion,” it is widely assumed that the thoughts of Darwinists and that of atheists overlap.However,Jerry Fodor,a full-fledged atheist,recently announced a war against Darwinism with his atheistic campaign.Prima facie,this “civil war” rnight offer a chance for theists:If Fodor is right,Darwinistic atheism will lose the cover of Darwinism and become less tenable.This paper provides a more pessimistic evaluation of the situation by explaining the following:Fodor's criticism of adaptationism (as the backbone of Darwinism),viz.,his refutation of any counterfactual-supporting laws on the macro-evolutionary level,implies that a law-maker is dispensable on this level.This will either encourage skepticism against the omniscience (at least that concerning the future of macro-evolution) of the Creator,or render the notion of God less appealing.