论文部分内容阅读
中国产业结构失衡在某种程度上与政府主导经济发展模式有关,但到底如何影响并在地域上又有何差异,这非常值得深入探讨。地方政府行为对于产业结构协调度的影响可以概括为两个方面:一是直接效应,地方政府的财政支出直接干预地方经济的效果;二是间接效应,地方政府通过对国有经济的影响进一步影响产业结构调整。基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析揭示了这两种效应的表现形式及地域差异。政府对产业结构的调整政策应该根据不同地区有所区别。
To some extent, the unbalanced industrial structure in China is related to the government-led economic development model. However, it is worth discussing in depth how the imbalance in the industrial structure will affect and differ in geographical terms. The influence of local government’s behavior on the coordination of industrial structure can be summed up in two aspects: one is direct effect, the direct expenditure of local government intervenes in the local economy; the other is indirect effect; the influence of local government on the state-owned economy further affects the industry Structural Adjustment. Empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data reveals the manifestations and geographical differences of these two effects. The government’s policy of adjusting industrial structure should be differentiated according to different regions.