论文部分内容阅读
“激愤杀人”行为与普通故意杀人行为相比,在主观可责难性上更小,为了给刑事辩护提供明确的法律依据以及具体的适用标准,提倡“激愤杀人”的刑事立法具有必要性。“激愤杀人”是指由于受害人暴力、侮辱等重大过错行为,导致行为人处于激愤或者情感强烈压抑的情况下实施的故意杀人行为。“激愤杀人”的适用较轻刑罚的渊源以及他国的立法经验都为“激愤杀人”的刑事立法提供了可行性。对于“激愤杀人”的立法路径,宜采用条文修改+立法解释的形式。
Compared with the ordinary intentional homicide, the act of “indignant murder” is smaller on the subjective blameworthiness. In order to provide a clear legal basis and specific applicable standards for criminal defense, the criminal legislation advocating “indignant murder” has necessity. “Resentful murder ” refers to the intentional homicide committed by the perpetrator in a situation of intense indignation or strong emotions due to the victim’s violent and insulting behaviors such as gross negligence. The origins of the application of lighter penalties and the legislative experience in other countries both provide the possibility of criminal legislation of “resentful killings”. As for the legislative path of “indignant murder”, the provisions should be adopted to amend the form of legislative interpretation.