论文部分内容阅读
在农民环境抗争中,如何证明自身遭遇到的污染以及污染受害是个重要问题,它将关系到农民维护自身环境权益的程度。从目前的情况看,农民在此过程中受到知识与权力的限制。“审判性真理”是福柯知识/权力研究的一个重要方面,它与真实性的界定密切相关。随着现代国家控制能力的加强以及政治经济渗透性的深入,“审判性真理”逐渐从依赖个体感官的“目击者证明”转为“监控”。在农民环境抗争的语境中,“审判性真理”表现为对人和自然进行客观化的那些知识手段,它们限制了农民对污染以及污染受害的证明。法律场域中的环境诉讼恰恰是观察和分析这种“审判性真理”的有效场域。
In the peasant environment struggle, how to prove its own pollution and pollution damage is an important issue, it will be related to farmers to maintain their own environmental rights and interests level. From the current situation, peasants are limited in knowledge and power in the process. “Judicial truth ” is an important aspect of Foucault ’s knowledge / power research, which is closely related to the definition of authenticity. With the strengthening of the control power of the modern state and the penetration of the political economy, “Judicial Truth ” has gradually shifted from “witness ” dependent on individual senses to “monitoring ”. In the context of peasant environmental protest, “the truth of judgment” is manifested as the means of knowledge that objectifies people and nature and limits the peasants’ proof of pollution and the victimization of pollution. Environmental litigation in the legal field is precisely the effective field of observation and analysis of this “judicial truth.”