从政策应对到组织解决——试论国民党三大前后青年运动政策之转变及其困境

来源 :学术探索 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:tian96610
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
南京国民政府成立之后,对治下青年运动历经“清党”、“暂停”、“整理”等多个阶段,但收效甚微。与此同时,国民党方面也一直试图从青年团体组织结构入手,寻求彻底解决青年问题之途径。在总结以往经验基础上,1929年3月召开的国民党第三次全国代表大会作出决议,将今后青年运动限定在“学校以内之自治生活”。国民党青年运动政策的这一转变使得青年学生的活动范围被限于校内而不至形成区域乃至全国联合,从而对“五四”以来青年运动的既定模式产生重大影响。然而,就其实施情况而言,这一青年运动新政又使得国民党方面陷入更为深层的困境之中。 After the establishment of the Nanjing National Government, the youth under the rule of the ruling party went through many stages such as “purifying the party,” “suspending,” “reorganizing,” and so on, but with little success. At the same time, the Kuomintang has also been trying to start with the organizational structure of youth groups and find ways to thoroughly solve the problem of youth. On the basis of summing up past experience, the third National Congress of the KMT in March 1929 resolved to limit the future youth movement to “autonomous life within schools.” This change of the Kuomintang youth movement policy made the young students’ scope of activities restricted to schools and not to regional and even national alliances, thereby having a significant impact on the established model of the youth movement since the May 4th Movement. However, as far as its implementation is concerned, this new campaign of the youth movement has caused the Kuomintang party to plunge into a deeper dilemma.
其他文献
云南怒江流域集中了非常丰富的少数民族文化多样性特色,但是近年来该流域少数民族文化在国际化、市场化的语境下正呈现出急剧弱化甚至消失的趋势,这其中有经济发展与文化发展
北京大学校长许智宏日前提议,将不在网上骂人等规定写入学生守则,以此规范北大师生的言行。此言一出,便引起各方争论,有人嘲笑“这真是千古奇谈”。  堂堂北京大学,中国第一学府,连不骂人也要放进校规进行规范,乍听确是不可思议。不能骂人,本是从小学一年级乃至从幼儿园开始就立下的“规矩”,不过是为人处世行为规范中的启蒙课,现在这种“A,B,C”到了大学还要从头学起,能不让人惊诧?  然而细细再想,北大校长所
简要介绍了国家储备林有关政策的来历,建设过程中PPP模式引入的背景,对二者结合的相关政策进行了解读。针对襄阳市国家储备林建设情况,对项目从发起到实施的整个过程做了简要