论文部分内容阅读
如何通过对具体案件的审判,将已有案例作为法律学习、研究和适用的资源,并在此基础上,规范司法权运作的程序,增强司法活动的社会效果,这是任何一个国家的法院都无法回避的话题。在“同案不同判”现象的困扰面前,我国一些地方法院尝试了案例制度,最高人民法院在2006年提出了“完善案例指导制度”的任务。正是借助案例制度,法院才得以通过制度复现手段,补强已有规则的效力,树立法律在整个社会中的权威;借助法定诉讼程序,保证制度的开放性,完成补充规则的任务。在补强效力与补充规则的关系上,补强效力是根本性目标,补充规则是辅助性目标。
How to pass the trial of specific cases, use the existing cases as resources for legal study, research and application, and on the basis of this, standardize the procedures for the operation of judicial power and enhance the social effects of judicial activities, which are all the courts of any country Unavoidable topic. In the face of the plague of “the same claimant and the different claimant” phenomenon, some local courts in our country tried the case system, and in 2006 the Supreme People’s Court put forward the task of “improving the case guiding system”. It is with the help of the case system that the court is able to reinforce the effectiveness of the existing rules and establish the authority of the law in society as a whole through the means of institutional reproduction. With the aid of legal proceedings, the openness of the system is guaranteed and the task of supplementing the rules is fulfilled. In terms of the relationship between the reinforcing effect and the supplementary rules, the reinforcing effect is the fundamental goal and the supplementary rule is the auxiliary goal.