论文部分内容阅读
由于刑事案件数量一直居高不下,而司法资源相对不足,导致了案件的积压。为了解决这一问题,提高诉讼效率,加快案件的审理速度,2003年3月14日,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、司法部联合颁布了《关于适用普通程序审理“被告人认罪案件”的若干意见(试行)》和《关于适用简易程序审理公诉案件的若干意见》。由此,普通程序简易审成为最高人民检察院公诉改革方案中的一项内容,全国各地展开了对刑事案件普通程序简易审的探索与试验。在普通程序简易审实施以来,人们对其评价褒贬不一。笔者认为普通程序简易审缺乏正当的理论基础,并且在实践中并不能收到预期的公正与效率相平衡的效果。因此,要想在正当法律程序前提下提高刑事诉讼的效率应当从其他角度找突破口,如完善简易程序,引进辩诉交易制度等,而不应生硬地简化庭审程序。
The high number of criminal cases and the relative lack of judicial resources have resulted in a backlog of cases. On March 14, 2003, the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the Ministry of Justice jointly promulgated the “Probation of Adoption for Trial of Ordinary Proceedings ” Defendant on March 14, 2003, in order to solve this problem, improve the efficiency of litigation and speed up the hearing of cases. (Provisional) “and” Several Opinions on the Trial of Public Prosecution Cases in Accordance with the Summary Procedure ". As a result, the simplified procedure of common procedure is one of the contents of the prosecutorial reform plan of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, and various localities have conducted exploration and experiments on the simplified procedure of the ordinary procedure of criminal cases throughout the country. Since the implementation of the simple procedure of ordinary procedures, people have mixed opinions. The author believes that the simple procedure of ordinary procedures lacks a proper theoretical basis and does not receive the expected balance of the effects of fairness and efficiency in practice. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency of criminal procedure on the premise of proper legal procedure, we should find breakthroughs from other angles, such as simplifying the summary procedure and introducing the system of plea bargaining instead of abruptly simplifying the trial procedure.