论文部分内容阅读
诈骗不法原因给付的行为能否构成诈骗罪,关键看不法原因给付财物是否为诈骗罪所保护的法益。传统观点基于法秩序统一性角度出发,认为刑法上保护的财产应是民法上的合法财产,对相关问题的探讨实质上是刑法之于民法独立性与从属性的判断,一方面要对诈骗罪保护的财产属性作出准确定性,另一方面要在法秩序统一性原理下对违法一元论进行正确理解。就诈骗罪保护的法益,应采取经济的财产说,主张财物价值的认定应根据客观经济价值判断无须具备民事上的合法性,由此得出的结论与缓和的违法一元论所主张的总体法秩序统一、各部门法领域有相对独立的判断的观点相契合,有利于财产犯罪法益的保护。
Whether fraud can constitute a crime of fraud, the key to see the legal reasons to pay for property is the legal interests protected by fraud. Based on the unity of legal order, the traditional viewpoints that the property protected by criminal law should be the legal property of civil law. The discussion of related issues is essentially the judgment of criminal law on the independence and subordination of civil law. On the one hand, On the other hand, it is necessary to correctly understand the unilateral law of illegitimacy under the principle of the unity of law and order. On the legal interests of the protection of fraud, economic property should be said that the claim that the value of property should be based on objective economic value judgments do not need to have the legitimacy of the civil, the conclusion drawn therefrom and mitigation of unilateral law advocated by the overall law and order Unity, the field of law in various departments have relatively independent judgments fit the point of view, is conducive to the protection of legal interests of property crime.