论文部分内容阅读
詹姆逊的文化研究理论对我们的影响至今还是余烟袅袅,迟迟没有散尽,东西方虽有意识形态的差异,但是全球化背景下的文化特征是极具渗透性的,虽不可照搬使用,但詹姆逊思考问题的方法为我们分析自己的文化现象提供了一种思路。记忆和历史是中国传统文学也是中国文人的思维支点,在精神分析诞生之前,这样的母题为我们的传统艺术主张打开了精神的通孔。事过境迁,当后现代来临,我们的文化景观当属何种类型,又能吸收些什么乃至做出什么?抛开所谓的对西方强势文化侵略的迎合这样的俗命题,我们仍有必要作一次深刻的追问。本文试就传统的记忆和历史两个语汇,循着詹姆逊的后现代二律背反思路,沿着意识形态和乌托邦的边沿就记忆与时间,以及历史在后现代当中的关系作一次系统的论述,揭示潜藏在它们当中的二律背反,有助于我们对传统文论作现代性的阐释,同时对新的文本进行合理的拓展和挖掘。
The influence of Jameson’s theory of cultural studies on us is still curled up by the smoke of cigarettes and has not yet been cleared up. Although there are ideological differences between east and west, the cultural characteristics in the context of globalization are very permeable. Although they can not be copied and used , But Jameson’s method of thinking about the problem provides us with an idea of how we analyze our own cultural phenomena. Memories and history are the traditional Chinese literary ideas of the Chinese literati. Before the birth of psychoanalysis, such motif opened the spiritual pass-through for our traditional artistic ideas. It is still necessary for us to make profound remarks when we turn to modern times, what kind of cultural landscapes we belong to, what we can absorb and even absorb what we call the vulgar proposition of the so-called strong cultural invasion of the West Questioning This article attempts to make a systematic discussion on the relationship between memory and time as well as the history in the postmodernity along the boundary of ideology and utopia according to Jameson’s two anti-postmodern ideas on traditional memory and history. Revealing the antinomies lurking in them helps us interpret the modernity of traditional literary theory and at the same time rationalize the new texts.