论文部分内容阅读
罗马与秦汉时期经济思想对比的专题研究目前尚不多见,但它对延续中西经济思想的比较研究及厘清中西经济思想演化的差异轨迹具有重要意义。通过对经济思想中的价值取向、思维方式和研究视野三个层面的对比研究,文章发现,罗马社会推崇个体权利的维护,而秦汉时期中国社会强调集体权利的维护;罗马学者惯以个体多轮谈判的方式思考经济问题,而秦汉时期的中国学者偏好以整体均衡分析的方式求解经济答案;加之二者在经济研究的视野方面存在诸多不同,因此,罗马与秦汉时期中西经济思想产生显著差异,中西经济思想的首次“大分流”就此形成。
However, it is of great significance to the continuation of the comparative study of the economic thinking between China and the West and to the clarification of the difference trajectory of the evolution of Sino-Western economic thought. Through comparing the three aspects of the value orientation, thinking mode and research vision of economic thought, the article finds that Roman society respects the maintenance of individual rights, while Chinese society in Qin and Han dynasties emphasizes the maintenance of collective rights. The Chinese scholars in the Qin and Han dynasties prefer to solve the economic problems by the method of overall equilibrium analysis. Besides, there are many differences in the field of vision of economic research. Therefore, there are significant differences between the Sino-Western economic thoughts in Rome and Qin and Han dynasties, The first “Great Divide Flow” of Chinese and Western economic thoughts came into being.