“经济史学”于1980年代在英国和美国成为一门大学学科,但法国和德国学者直到今天似乎还不太愿意设置这样一门学科。在他们的心目中,历史学就是历史学,是否还需要或能够再分成若干门专史呢?马克思和恩格斯都著作等身,但未写一部“经济史”专著;法国年鉴学派成员中,有的以著《封建社会》名世;有的写了《资本主义与文明》的长篇钜制,认为历史可以称为“社会经济史”,却反对“经济”单独成史。 “Economic history” became a university discipline in the United Kingdom and the United States in the 1980s, but until now, French and German scholars seemed reluctant to set up such a discipline. In their minds, history is history, whether it still needs or can be subdivided into a number of specialized history? Marx and Engels are writings, but did not write a “economic history” monographs; French Yearbook school members, there are Of the famous “feudal society”; some wrote a long history of “capitalism and civilization”, that history can be called “social and economic history”, but opposed to “economy” as a separate history.