在近代中日关系史上 ,大亚细亚主义是一个需要深入研究的重要课题。将大亚细亚主义与日本幕末时期的“攘夷”论和明治维新后的“兴亚”论联系起来 ,以证明其“含有一定的客观历史进步因素” ,是不恰当的。大亚细亚主义乃是萌生与形成于甲午战争之后 ,是日本走向帝国主义时代的产物 ,是指导其在亚洲、特别是在中国与西方列强争衡策略或手段的侵略理论。 In the history of modern Sino-Japanese relations, Asianism is an important topic that needs further study. It is not appropriate to link the relationship between Asianism and the “barbarous” theory in the Japanese Bakugan era and the “Xingya” theory after the Meiji Restoration to prove that it “contains some objective historical progress factors.” It was the product of Japan’s move toward imperialism after its initiation and formation in the Sino-Japanese War, and its theory of aggression that guided its strategy or measure in Asia, especially in China and the Western powers.