Influence of Wildfires on Ozone Concentration in the U.S.Intermountain West

来源 :第32届中国气象学会年会 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:VIPYJS
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Wildfires are important sources of ozone by emitting large amounts of NOx and NMVOC, main ozone precursors, at both global and regional scales.Their influences on ozone in the U.S.Intermountain West have recently received much interest because surface ozone concentrations over that region showed an increasing trend in the past two decades likely due to increasing wildfire emissions in a warming climate.Here we use the Lagrangian particle dispersion model (FLEXPART) as well as the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model to study the relationship between wildfires and ozone concentration in the US Intermountain West in the past 22 years (1989-2010) at both daily and inter-annual timescales.We combined the resident time estimates from the FLEXPART 5-day backward trajectories and a high-resolution fire inventory to define a fire index describing the impact of wildfires on ozone concentration at a particular site for each day of the summers 1989-2010.Over 26000 simulations of FLEXPART back-trajectories were conducted for the whole time period and for the 13 CASTNet surface monitoring sites.High ozone episodes were found associated with high fire index and temperature.We built multiple linear regression (MLR) models of daily ozone concentrations using fire index and other meteorological variables (temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity) for each year at each site.The regression models explained 42% of the ozone variations (ranging from 23% to 68% for each site), and showed that ozone productions of biomass burning are of high variability (ranging from 0.1 ppbv to 18.7 ppbv).We further conducted the GEOS-Chem nested simulation for summer 2006-2008.Wildfires ozone influences were calculated as the difference between the standard simulations and a sensitivity simulation with wildfire emissions turned off.We showed wildfire ozone influences estimated from the two approaches were highly correlated, indicating consistency between the Lagrangian and Eulerian models.
其他文献
本文利用电离层热层模型(TIEGCM)研究对流层迁移潮汐波对中纬电离层电子密度经度向变化的影响及其内在物理机制。研究发现:迁移潮汐波对电离层较高高度(≥250km,F层)电子密度的经度向结构有明显影响,南北半球电子密度呈单波结构,主要出现在白天时段(1lh-20h,MLT),南北半球波相位近乎相同;而在非迁移潮汐波的影响下,南北半球电子密度呈现四波结构。在电离层较低高度(E层),电子密度的经度向分
we use the magnetic field data from C/NOFS after correcting the interpolation data to study the MLT variations and the propagations of magnetic perturbations, and their relationships with interplaneta
本文基于1979-2012年臭氧总量的卫星遥感数据,考察了太平洋上空0-15.、15-30°和30-45°三个纬度带臭氧总量变化特征及长期趋势,并对各纬度带的变化特征进行了比较分析.结果表明,臭氧总量随着纬度带的升高而增加,各纬度带臭氧的年际、季节变化均呈现出随时间的下降趋势.其中0-15°和15-30°区域臭氧的线性拟合下降趋势并不显著;30-45°区域臭氧线性下降趋势较显著.1979-2012
在山东滨州地区进行的传统人工触发闪电实验中,当金属导线随火箭上升至一定高度时,在强电场的作用下,导线顶端开始形成击穿空气并向上发展的正先导过程,这些正先导辐射出的磁场信号被安装在距离引雷点78 m处的一套由东西向和南-北向两根正交磁天线组成的高灵敏度低频磁场采集系统接收,该磁场采集系统的带宽为30~300 kHz(3 dB带宽为6~340 kHz),磁场信号采用12位的Yokogawa DL750
闪电是大气中常见的一种放电现象,包括云闪和地闲。由于地闪具有大电流、强电磁辐射等特征,常常引发各种雷电灾害,对人类的生产生活带来了很大影响。目前在雷电的直接防护设计中,主要利用滚球法来确定建筑物防雷接闪器的保护范围,根据已有的一些经验公式进行计算,但是无法深入探讨闪电的内在物理机理,在雷电防护设计中依然存在很多技术问题需要深入研究。然而使用闪电先导模型模拟研究闪电先导的发展及其与地物的连接过程以及
连接过程是闪电研究领域的"十大问题之一",正确地认识连接过程对雷电防护有重要意义[1].闪电先导发生连接过程时,人们普遍认为下行先导的头部会与上行连接先导的头部连接,然而,吕伟涛[2]等在一次下行负极性地闪的高速摄像资料中首次发现了下行先导和UCL的连接点在UCL的头部以下,进一步的研究表明,这种现象比头部与头部连接的形式要更加普遍,因此,对连接过程的连接形态展开研究,具有重要意义.
选取2008~2013年登陆我国东南沿海的台风,利用WWLLN闪电定位资料、热带气旋路径和强度资料、FY-2C卫星资料、LIS闪电探测资料、NCEP再分析资料和地面气象雷达资料,对台风闪电的时空分布和变化特征进行分析,特别是对不同路径台风在登陆前后,闪电活动的变化特征和差异做统计研究。结果表明,2008~ 2013年登陆我国东南沿海的台风中,中心区域的平均闪电密度较大,外雨带的平均闪电频数最多。强
避雷器冲击电流耐受能力是影响其性能的重要因素,国内外标准中规定避雷器应通过大电流冲击耐受试验,对强雷电负载区域避雷器,试验要求采用30/80us波形电流。为研究避雷器阀片在30/80us波形冲击电流下的耐受特性,并与4/10us波形下的冲击电流耐受特性相比较,选取了国内线路避雷器常用的三种型号交流氧化锌避雷器阀片,分别对其施加10kA到40kA的30/80us波形冲击电流和65kA到100kA的4
国标GB11032 2010指出应采用持续时间在200μs~230μ s之间的类正弦波冲击电流模拟多重雷击效应进行雷电冲击放电能力试验来验证线路避雷器的额定雷电冲击放电能力.线路放电等级为1级的避雷器单次类正弦波放电冲击的能量应不高于由1次4/10μs、100kA大电流冲击而产生的能量.近期CIGRE避雷器工作组提出可将持续时间在200μs~230μs之间的类正弦波调整为易于采用现有冲击电流发生器
Eurasian snow cover fraction (SCF) prediction is analyzed using the recently developed NCEP Climate Forecast System, version 2 (CFSv2) monthly retrospective forecasts for 1983-2009.Generally, the CFSv