论文部分内容阅读
崔述考信辨伪,注意从客观、主观以及史事流传三个方面考察古史出现谬误的原因,从流动性、过程性的宏观角度考察古史失真问题,值得注意。他以经为标准,辨析传注、诸子、杂说等对于古史的解释和杜撰,以顺源追流法和溯流达源法,追随古史失真的过程进行考辨,运用演绎法,从文体、时代风气出发辨伪,取得很大成绩。由于崔述在经史关系上是个二元论者,就使得他在考辨古史时往往在历史判断和道德判断之间陷入深深的矛盾,从而影响到他考信辨伪的成就。
Cui Shu test and verify the falsehood, attention from the objective, subjective and historical circulating three aspects of the reasons for the fallacy of ancient history, from the perspective of liquidity, process of macro-historical perspective of distortion, it is noteworthy. He used the standard as a criterion to analyze the explanation and fabrication of the ancient history by means of annotation, philosophers, miscellaneous sayings, and so on. It uses the source-following method and the source-tracking method to trace the process of the distortion of ancient history. By using the deductive method, From the style, the trend of the times starting from the pseudo, made great achievements. Because Cui Shu was a dualist in the history-historical relations, he often got deep contradictions between the historical judgments and the moral judgments in the process of examining the ancient history, thus affecting his achievements in examining the false records.