论文部分内容阅读
判决在诉讼当事人之间发生既判力,对于不受既判力所及的特定案外第三人,应当发生反射效力,以补救既判力相对性原则产生的弊端。反射效力性质的理论,有反射效力说〔1〕、既判力扩张说和争点效扩张说。反射效力应当被理解为一个概括的统称而不是具体的性质,它包含了既判力扩张与争点效扩张,应从其发生的具体机制分析它的性质。同时,我国的民事实体法的一些特殊性也影响个例中是否发生反射效力的判断。
The verdict res judicata between litigants, and the third party who is not subject to res judicata should act as a reflex to remedy the malpractice arising from the principle of res judicata. Reflective validity of the theory, the effectiveness of the reflex said [1], res judicata expansion and expansion of the argument said. The effectiveness of reflection should be understood as a general rather than a concrete one. It includes the expansion of res judicata and the expansion of the issue of efficiency. Its nature should be analyzed from the specific mechanism in which it occurs. At the same time, some particularities of the civil substantive law of our country also affect the judgments of whether the reflection effect occurs in each case.