论文部分内容阅读
五代以后,史家对《复溪州铜柱记》的研究和考证颇多,然良莠并存,正误杂揉,令今人常生疑窦。笔者拟从《复溪州铜柱记》之原刻文字入手,就前人所议之舛误,试作辨正如下。一、同原刻不符之数书所载辨正对《复溪州铜柱记》原刻之文字,自该柱面世后,诸多正史及地方志曾予转录,然这些转录或不完整,或存谬误,留传及今,常令学人不知所从。笔者去夏专程赴湖南永顺王村镇,对铜柱再作考察,并逐字录原得刻文字。兹将数书脱漏谬误之处,加括号附于各正文之后,经重新标点,并引于下:
After the Five Dynasties, historians have studied and verified many of the “Bronze Column of Fuxi Prefecture”, but there are a lot of good and bad coexist. The author intends to start from the original engraved text “Fuxi Creek Tongzhu” to the previous mistakes, try to distinguish as follows. First, the book does not match the original engraved with the number of books is on the “Fuxi Creek Tongzhu” the original engraved text, since the column after the world, many historical and local records have been transcribed, but these transcripts are incomplete or absurd , Pass on and today, often make scholars do not know what to follow. The author went to Xiazhuo to go to Wangcun, Yongshun County, Hunan Province for an inspection of copper pillars and recorded the original verbatim. I hereby omit the fallacy of the book, with brackets attached to the main text, after the re-punctuation, and leads to the next: