论文部分内容阅读
通过运用督促程序向债务人发出支付令,及时维护了公民和法人的合法权益,取得了较好的社会效果.但由于督促程序是新的程序,制定的条款简略、原则,尚无具体的实施细则,所以,审判人员在支付令申请的受理,支付令文书的格式、送达、对债务人异议的处理等问题上认识不一,作法不同。笔者根据本院53件支付令的司法实践对适用督促程序的有关问题谈一些不成熟的见解。一、督促程序是非讼程序还是诉讼程序有的同志认为,督促程序是民事诉讼法中的一
Through the use of supervisory procedures to issue payment orders to the debtor, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and legal persons in a timely manner, and achieving good social effects. However, due to supervise the procedure is a new procedure, the formulation of a simple article, the principle that there is no specific implementation details Therefore, the judicial personnel have different opinions on such issues as the acceptance of payment orders, the format of payment order instruments, the handling of objections to debtors, and so on. Based on the judicial practice of 53 payment orders in this hospital, the author talks about some immature opinions on the issues concerning the application of supervisory procedures. First, to urge the procedure is a non-litigation process or litigation proceedings Some comrades believe that the supervision procedure is a civil procedure law