论文部分内容阅读
借用法规是美国冲突法上的重要概念,与诉讼时效法律冲突的解决紧密相连。本文首先阐述了借用法规的性质,接着论述借用法规的实践运用及运用过程中存在的问题,并论及美国冲突法理论嬗变对借用法规适用的影响。作者指出,借用法规由于自身理论上的缺陷和适用上的困难,并不是一条解决时效冲突的良好路径,应当加以废除。废除借用法规后,应采取将诉讼时效识别为实体问题的方法来解决时效冲突。美国解决时效冲突的实践也给我国带来了一定的启示,目前,我国《国际私法示范法》的相关规定比较可取,建议我国立法机关在将来的立法中采用。
Borrowing laws and regulations is an important concept in the conflict law of the United States and is closely linked with the settlement of legal conflicts of limitation of action. This article first expounds the nature of borrowing regulations, then discusses the practical application of borrowing laws and regulations and the problems in their application, and discusses the impact of the evolution of the theory of conflict of laws on the application of borrowing laws and regulations. The author points out that the borrowing of laws and regulations is not a good way to solve the conflict of limitations but should be abolished because of its own theoretical defects and difficulties in application. After repealing the borrowing regulations, the method of identifying the limitation of action as an entity should be adopted to resolve the conflict of limitations. At present, the relevant provisions of the “Private International Law Model Law” in our country are more desirable. It is suggested that China’s legislature should adopt it in future legislation.