论文部分内容阅读
两个学者在彼此毫无联系的情况下通过各自的独立研究而得出了同样的结论,这种现象在科学研究的历史上并非罕见,诸如达尔文与华莱士在相互不知晓的情况下提出了同样的生物进化理论,牛顿与莱布尼茨各自完全独立地发现了微积分,马克思、恩格斯和狄慈根通过不同的道路而揭示了辩证唯物主义。这种貌似偶然的巧合实则有着必然的基础,这就是科学揭示真理的能力和人类思维的同构性。制度法理学的产生方式又一次显示了科学研究中的这种奇迹。1969年,奥地利卡尔—福伦兹大学法哲学研究所的研究员奥塔·温伯格在一篇极为哲学化的论文(“作为思想与作为现实的规范”《奥地利公法杂志》总第20期)中首次提出
The two scholars, without any connection to each other, reached the same conclusion through their own independent studies, which are not uncommon in the history of scientific research, such as Darwin’s and Wallace’s not knowing each other The same theory of biological evolution, Newton and Leibniz each discovered calculus completely independently, and Marx, Engels, and Diezgen revealed dialectical materialism on different paths. This seemingly coincidental coincidence actually has an inevitable basis. This is the ability of science to reveal truth and the homogeneity of human thinking. The emergence of institutional jurisprudence once again shows this miracle in scientific research. In 1969, Otto Weinberger, a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy and Law at the University of Karl-Foley in Austria, wrote in a very philosophical essay (“As a rule of thought and as a reality” “Austrian Public Law Journal” Period) for the first time