论文部分内容阅读
人神关系冲突这条线索在《鲁滨逊漂流记》当中的存在是合理、可以系统论证的。示范性地从这个角度出发,重新解读小说的开篇,是系统论证这条线索存在尤为重要的一个方面。圣经伦理中的道德和宗教衡量标准在小说的故事情节发展中一以贯之——就宗教而言是人神关系,就辩证法而言是个体与实体的关系。主人公克鲁索违抗父命开始冒险旅程,内涵着以人神关系为表征的个体与实体关系之冲突,其发生、发展具有内在的必然性。所谓道德和宗教的衡量标准以何为准,作者笛福本人在小说中也提到,以《圣经》为最终的依据。从圣经伦理角度解读这部作品是极具启发性的,也是作者笛福本人所期望的,有原版序言为证。这将不同于学界普遍从文学史、艺术手法、个人英雄主义、女性主义、人权法律、后殖民主义理论,或宗教神学等角度进行的研究。
The conflict between human and god is the existence of this clue in Robinson Crusoe is reasonable and can be systematically demonstrated. Demonstrating from this point of view, reinterpreting the opening of novels is an aspect that is especially important in this systematic demonstration of clues. Ethical and religious measures in biblical ethics are consistent throughout the plot development of the novel - in the case of religion, the relationship between man and god, and in the case of dialectics, the relationship between the individual and the entity. The protagonist Crusoe violates father’s life and starts the adventure journey, which implies the conflict between the individual and the entity, which is characterized by the relationship between man and god. The occurrence and development of the character has inherent inevitability. The so-called standard of morality and religion, whichever is the author Defoe himself also mentioned in the novel, the Bible as the ultimate basis. It is instructive to interpret this work from the perspective of biblical ethics. It is also what Defoe himself expected, with the original preface as evidence. This will be different from what scholars generally study from the perspectives of literary history, artistic techniques, individual heroism, feminism, human rights law, post-colonial theory, or religious theology.