论文部分内容阅读
颈脊髓造影采用C1-2侧方穿刺造影效果满意[1、2],但严重并发症和失败时有发生[3、4]。传统腰穿颈脊髓造影效果较差[2、5]。我院用Tamura[6]报道的腰椎穿刺颈脊髓造影法,从1992年以来完成29例颈脊髓造影;同时一组C1-2侧方穿刺造影31例作为对照组。现将两组结果对比分析如下
Cervical myelography using C1-2 lateral puncture radiography satisfactory [1,2], but serious complications and failures have occurred [3,4]. Traditional lumbar spinal cord myopia with poor results [2,5]. My hospital with Tamura [6] reported by the lumbar puncture cervical spinal cord radiography, from 1992 to complete 29 cases of cervical myelography; while a group of C1-2 lateral puncture angiography 31 cases as a control group. The results of the two groups are now analyzed as follows