论文部分内容阅读
对“间接征收”的界定和判断是国际投资领域中划分权利义务的基础性和关键性环节,然而国际条约对间接征收缺乏明确、统一的认定,我国关于间接征收的规约呈现出诸多问题。国际争端实践对“效果与目的兼顾标准”的倾向选择及其对标准内涵的释义具有重要意义。因此我国应当在协同国内外规范、明确条约内容、平衡国家经济主权与投资自由权等方面作出努力。
The definition and judgment of “indirect collection ” is the basic and key link in the division of rights and obligations in the field of international investment. However, the international treaties lacks the explicit and unified recognition of indirect collection. Our country’s convention on indirect collection presents many problems . The practice of international disputes is of great significance to the choice of tendencies to take into account the standard of effect and purpose and its interpretation of the standard connotation. Therefore, our country should make efforts in coordinating the domestic and foreign regulations, clarifying the contents of the treaty, balancing the country’s economic sovereignty and the right to freedom of investment.