论文部分内容阅读
明代以来的各种文献中,保存了不少涉及沈万三的内容,有些具有一定的事实根据,但大多充满浓郁的传奇色彩。多年来,学者们陆续发表了一批研究成果,对沈万三及其家族人物进行考证,提出一些值得重视的见解,但也出现不少难以成立的臆说和讹误。通过对相关史料和各家见解进行系统梳理和研读,可以基本确定,被很多学者视为关键史料的王行所撰《沈荣甫墓志铭》,其实和沈万三没有任何关系;而王行《半轩集》中提到的沈达卿,应当就是沈万三的次子沈旺。沈万三很有可能活到了明朝初年,但他本人似乎并未遭遇抄家流放,世上流传的相关故事,可能是把其后裔的一些事情附会到他本人身上。当时长洲县二十六都和吴江县二十九都皆有周庄,沈万三家在两个周庄都有宅第,但其家的黄册户籍应是隶属吴江县而非长洲县。
Since the Ming Dynasty a variety of documents, save a lot of content involved Shen Wansan, some have some facts, but most are full of rich legendary. Over the years, scholars have published a number of research results successively to conduct a textual research on Shen Wan-san and his family members and put forward some valuable observations. However, many unscrupulous and corrupt ideas have also emerged. Through systematically reviewing and reading relevant historical materials and various opinions, it is basically confirmed that “the epitaph of Shen Rongfu” written by Wang Xing, which is regarded as a key historical material by many scholars, does not actually have anything to do with Shen San-san; "Mentioned Shen Daqing, should be the second son Shen Wang Shen Wang Shen. Shen Wan-san is likely to live in the early years of the Ming Dynasty, but he himself did not seem to have suffered any excuse to excuse himself. The stories circulating around the world may have attached some of his descendants to himself. At that time, 26 counties in Changzhou County and Wujiang County in Twenty-Nine all had Zhouzhuang and Shenwan Sanzhaizha in both Zhouzhuang. However, the registered permanent residence of Huangzha was supposed to belong to Wujiang County instead of Changzhou County.