论文部分内容阅读
从中国海关进口交易数据库中提取了中国反倾销涉案产品的季度进口数据,采用双重固定效应模型对我国反倾销措施是否引起来自于指控对象国、非指控对象国和全球的进口贸易及其边际的变化进行了实证检验,得出如下结论:一方面,反倾销主要通过成本效应提高了涉案产品价格、控制了进口激增,可能会对国内进口竞争性企业起到较好的贸易救济效果;另一方面,反倾销几乎强制地将下游企业的采购渠道从国外转移到国内,征收的反倾销税不仅加重了它们的生产成本负担,还减少了它们的进口产品种类,损害了下游企业的利益。因此,对外反倾销时,应同时考虑进口竞争性企业和下游企业的利益。
China imported the quarterly import data of products involved in anti-dumping from the China Customs import transaction database and adopted the dual fixed-effects model to analyze whether the anti-dumping measures of our country caused the import trade and its marginal changes from the target countries, non-target countries and the world The empirical test leads to the following conclusions: On the one hand, anti-dumping mainly increases the prices of the products involved through cost-effectiveness and controls the surge in imports, which may result in better trade remedy for domestic import-oriented enterprises; on the other hand, anti-dumping The purchasing channels of downstream enterprises are almost forced to be transferred from abroad to the Mainland. The anti-dumping duty imposed on them not only aggravates their production cost burden, but also reduces the types of their imported products and undermines the interests of downstream enterprises. Therefore, foreign anti-dumping should also consider the interests of import competitive enterprises and downstream enterprises.