论文部分内容阅读
以往研究关注到流动人口的家庭化趋势,但并未论及不同类型城市之间家庭化趋势的差异,家庭化趋势对城镇化政策的参考意义更是缺乏讨论。通过对2014年南京大学农民工抽样调查数据的分析,研究发现,总体而言,城市规模越大,农民工的家庭同住趋势越弱,但大城市与中等城市的差异并不大。同样值得重视的是,农民工的年龄越小,家庭同住趋势越强。无论是从当前大城市农民工的家庭同住趋势看,还是从年轻农民工代表的长远发展趋势看,当前政府严格控制大城市农民工市民化进程的做法,都亟待调整。进一步的数据分析还表明,当前农民工市民化的主要诉求并非落户,而是以子女教育为核心内容的城市公共服务;应优先解决大城市农民工的子女教育问题,同时尽快建立财政转移支付同农业转移人口市民化挂钩机制。
In the past, the study focused on the trend of familialization of migrants, but did not discuss the differences in the trend of familialization among different types of cities. The reference significance of the tendency of familization to urbanization policies was even less discussed. Through the analysis of the sample survey data of migrant workers in Nanjing University in 2014, we find that in general, the larger the size of cities, the weaker the trend of family cohabitation of migrant workers, but the difference between big cities and middle-sized cities is not large. It is also worth noting that the smaller the age of migrant workers, the stronger the tendency of family living together. Whether it is from the trend of domestic cohabitation of migrant workers in large cities or from the long-term development trend of the representatives of young migrant workers, the current government’s strict control over the process of urbanization of migrant workers in big cities needs to be adjusted urgently. Further analysis of the data also shows that the main demands of peasant workers’ citizenization are not settlement but urban public services with children’s education as the core content. The priority should be given to solving the education of peasant workers in big cities and at the same time establishing the fiscal transfer payment Agricultural transfer of the population of urbanization linked mechanism.