论文部分内容阅读
与近代以来的职业化相一致,社会治理体系及其过程中也出现了职业化。职业化造就了一个以社会治理为专业的知识精英集团,这个集团中的成员为了在社会治理过程中实现对社会的技术控制,努力把社会治理体系营建成一个建立在专业知识基础上的封闭体系。就官僚制组织而言,技术控制是基于一种形式合理性的追求而建构起来的,在工业社会这一历史阶段中,这种技术控制发挥了巨大的正向功能。但是,在后工业化的过程中,技术控制的消极效应日益彰显。20世纪后期以来,学者们对官僚制组织以及社会治理中的技术控制给予了激烈的批判,而在如何终结技术控制的问题上却是莫衷一是。其实,技术控制的终结将是一场组织变革的成果。也就是说,当人类的社会治理不再依赖官僚制组织,而是建立起了合作制组织去取代官僚制组织,技术控制也就完全失去了历史合理性,从而被人们所抛弃。
Consistent with the professionalism in modern times, social governance system and its process also appeared in the occupation. Professionalization created a group of intellectual elites specialized in social governance. The members of this group endeavored to build a social governance system into a closed system based on professional knowledge in order to achieve technological control over the society in the process of social governance. . As far as bureaucratic organizations are concerned, technological control is based on a formal and rational pursuit that has played a tremendously positive role in the historical stage of industrial society. However, in the process of post-industrialization, the negative effect of technical control has become increasingly evident. Since the late 20th century, scholars have fiercely criticized the bureaucratic system and the technical control in social governance, but there is no agreement on how to end the control of technology. In fact, the end of technology control will be the result of an organizational change. In other words, when human social governance no longer depends on bureaucratic organizations, but instead sets up cooperative organizations instead of bureaucratic organizations, the control of the arts completely loses its historical rationality and is therefore discarded.