论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨北京部分高校大学生竞争心理的特点,了解体育专业与普通大学生竞争心理的不同,为学校竞争心理的教育提供一定的理论依据。方法:采用由王极盛教授编制的创新心理素质量表的竞争心理子量表,在此基础上加以改编,对北京师范大学、北京化工大学、首都师范大学、中央民族大学、北京理工大学856名体育专业和普通大学生进行问卷调查,分析体育专业与普通大学生竞争心理的不同。结果:1)北京部分高校体育专业、文科、理科大学生的竞争心理的平均分均在3.00分以上,说明其竞争心理均处于中等偏上的水平;2)北京部分高校体育专业、文科、理科大学生的竞争心理测量结果为:男性分别是:3.83±0.41、3.50±0.25、3.45±0.46,女性分别是:3.79±0.40、3.43±0.63、3.30±0.31,同一专业不同性别的大学生都没有显著性差异;3)不同性别的体育专业、文科、理科大学生在竞争心理水平上有显著性差异,其中:男性方面:体育专业大学生的竞争心理显著高于文科(P<0.05),体育专业大学生的竞争心理高于理科具有非常显著性差异(P<0.01);女性方面:体育专业大学生的竞争心理明显高于文科(P<0.05),体育专业大学生的竞争心理高于理科具有非常显著性(P<0.01)。结论:北京部分高校体育专业、文科、理科大学生的竞争心理均处于中等偏上的水平,而且性别方面没有明显的差异;无论男生还是女生,体育专业的大学生都比文理科竞争心理水平高。
Objective: To explore the characteristics of competitive psychology of college students in some colleges and universities in Beijing, understand the difference of competitive psychology between PE majors and ordinary college students, and provide some theoretical basis for the education of competing psychology in schools. Methods: The competing psychological sub-scale of the innovative psychological quality scale compiled by Professor Wang Jinsheng was adopted and adapted based on it. The research was carried out on Beijing Normal University, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Capital Normal University, Minzu University of China, Beijing Institute of Technology The sports major and ordinary college students conducted a questionnaire survey to analyze the difference between the competitive psychology of sports majors and ordinary college students. Results: 1) The average scores of competition psychology of PE majors, liberal arts majors and science majors in some colleges and universities in Beijing are above 3.00 points, indicating that their competitive psychology are above average; 2) Some PE major, liberal arts and science undergraduates The results of competitive psychology were: 3.83 ± 0.41, 3.50 ± 0.25 and 3.45 ± 0.46 for males and 3.79 ± 0.40, 3.43 ± 0.63, and 3.30 ± 0.31 for females, respectively, and no significant difference was found in the same majors (P <0.05). The competitive psychology of PE majors is significantly higher than that of liberal majors (P <0.05). The competitive psychology of PE majors (P <0.01). For females, the competition psychology of PE majors was significantly higher than that of arts (P <0.05), and PE majors’ competing psychology was significantly higher than that of science (P <0.01) ). Conclusion: The competitive psychology of PE majors, liberal arts majors and science majors in some colleges and universities in Beijing are above the middle level, and there is no obvious gender difference. Both males and females, sports majors have higher competitive psychology than liberal arts students.