论文部分内容阅读
近日,原告广州直通车眼镜有限公司诉被告杨某某擅自使用他人企业名称纠纷一案,广州市越秀区人民法院受理后,依法组成合议庭,并公开开庭进行了审理。本案现已审理终结。原告诉称:2005年2月28日,原告在广州市工商行政管理局越秀分局登记注册成立,法人对工商部门登记的名称享有名称权,“直通车”作为企业名称依法受法律保护。2004年12月24日,原告的法定代表人向国家商标局在第44类“眼镜行”申请注册“直通车”服务
Recently, the Plaintiff Guangzhou Cart Eye Co., Ltd. v. Defendant Yang Moumou unauthorized use of another person’s name dispute case, Guangzhou Yuexiu District People’s Court accepted, according to the law to form a collegiate bench, and held a public hearing. The case is now closed. The plaintiff claimed: On February 28, 2005, the plaintiff was registered in Yuexiu Branch of Guangzhou Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce. The legal person entitled to the name registered in the business sector, “through train” was legally protected by law as the name of the enterprise. On December 24, 2004, the legal representative of the plaintiff applied to the State Trademark Bureau for applying for the “train-through” service in the 44th class