论文部分内容阅读
目的:探索氧气雾化吸入与超声雾化吸入治疗小儿呼吸系统疾病的临床疗效。方法:选取我院2015年2月~2016年2月小儿呼吸系统疾病患儿196例,随机划分为观察组与对照组,每组98例,对观察组患儿给予氧化雾化吸入治疗,对对照组给予超声雾化吸入治疗,然后对观察组与对照组进行临床疗效观察,并对两组疗效进行比较分析。结果:观察组患儿经过氧化雾化吸入治疗后,总效率高达100.00%,对照组经过超声雾化吸入治疗后,总有效率为90.82%,观察组治疗效果明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组患儿咳嗽、呼吸困难和肺部啰音消失时间明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在小儿呼吸系统疾病治疗中使用氧气雾化吸入,其治疗效果明显优超声雾化吸入,且没有不良反应,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of inhalation of oxygen and ultrasonic atomization inhalation in the treatment of pediatric respiratory diseases. Methods: A total of 196 children with respiratory diseases in our hospital from February 2015 to February 2016 were randomly divided into observation group (n = 98) and control group (n = 98). The patients in observation group were treated with oxidative atomization inhalation. The control group was treated with ultrasonic atomization inhalation, and then observed the clinical efficacy of the observation group and the control group, and compared the efficacy of the two groups. Results: In the observation group, the total efficiency was as high as 100.00% after the inhalation of aerosolized atomization. The total effective rate was 90.82% in the control group after the inhalation by ultrasonic atomization. The treatment effect in the observation group was obviously better than that in the control group (P <0.05). The cough, dyspnea and disappearance of pulmonary rales in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of respiratory diseases in children using oxygen atomization inhalation, the treatment effect is superior to ultrasonic atomization inhalation, and no adverse reactions, is worthy of clinical application.