论文部分内容阅读
对侵害财产权的损害赔偿,基于人格权与财产权的二分,一直以来仅赔偿财产损失,2001年《最高人民法院关于确定民事侵权精神损害赔偿责任若干问题的解释》(文中简称《司法解释》)第4条突破性地确立了对“具有人格象征意义的特定纪念物品”的精神损害赔偿制度,但是对“特定纪念物品”的界定远远不能满足现实社会中存在的精神损害赔偿的需求。基于此,本文在解读“特定纪念物品”的基础上进行理论扩张,更全面保护受害人,体现民法的人文情怀。
The damages for infringement of property rights, based on the dichotomy of the personality right and the property right, have always only provided compensation for the loss of property. In 2001, “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Determination of the Liability for Compensation for the Spiritual Damage of Spiritual Infringement” (hereinafter referred to as “judicial interpretation”) 4 sets out to groundbreakingly the system of mental damages for the “special commemorative objects with symbolic personalities”, but the definition of “specific commemorative objects” is far from satisfying the compensation for moral damages existing in the real world demand. Based on this, this article expands the theory based on the interpretation of “special commemorative objects”, protects the victim more completely and embodies the humanistic sentiment of civil law.