论文部分内容阅读
一九六五年情报图书馆学界掀起了对《国际十进分类法》(以下简称UDC)的批判,当时认为UDC在政治上是反动的,科学上是反科学的,技术方法上是神秘主义的,从而全盘否定并采取措施,将其销毁或封存。众所周知,UDC在国际上是广泛采用的分类法,我们应当实事求是地分析、评一价UDC。这对促进科技情报工作的开展,是十分必要的。 UDC的政治倾向我们评价一部分类法,总的原则是将其放在一定的历史条件下,作历史的全面的分析。分类法的政治思想倾向,主要体现于它的哲学思想基础,它的体系和它的类目中。 UDC最初发表于一九○五年,是由比利时人奥特勒等在美国《杜威十进分类法》
In 1965, the academic circles of the intelligence library set off criticism of the International Classification of Decisions (UDC). At that time, UDC was considered politically reactive, scientifically antiscientific, and technologically mysterious In order to disclaim and take measures to destroy or seal it. As we all know, UDC is a widely used taxonomy in the world. We should analyze and evaluate UDC in a realistic and realistic way. This is very necessary to promote the work on science and technology intelligence. UDC's Political Inclinations We value some of the taxonomies. The general principle is to put them under a certain historical condition and make a comprehensive historical analysis. Taxonomy of political ideological tendencies, mainly reflected in its philosophical foundation, its system and its category. UDC was originally published in 1905, is by the Belgian Ottler in the United States, “Dewey Decimal Classification”