论文部分内容阅读
当前在理论上关于仲裁的性质问题存在争议,有契约说、司法权说、混合说及自治说等。从语义上看,仲裁强调裁决的法律性拘束力;从历史演进上看,仲裁伴随着国家的建立与权力行使更加具有强制力和权威性;从程序性质上看,仲裁要求司法支持。仲裁的性质是在历史的演进中不断发展变化的,而在现时代,应以兼顾契约性和司法性的混合说为是。
At present, there are controversies on the nature of arbitration in theory, such as the theory of contract, the theory of judicial power, the theory of mixture and autonomy. Semantically, the arbitration emphasizes the legal binding force of the ruling. Judging from the historical evolution, the arbitrator is more forceful and authoritative with the establishment of the state and the exercise of the power. Judging from the nature of the procedure, the arbitration requires judicial support. The nature of arbitration is constantly evolving in the evolution of history. In the present era, the arbitration should be said to be a combination of contractual and judicial consideration.