论文部分内容阅读
1998年7月11日,中央电视台现场直播了北京市第一中级人民法院开庭审理上海等十家电影制片厂诉北京天都电影版权代理中心、天津泰达音像发行中心、中影音像出版社侵犯著作权一案的过程,引起了全国各界的热切关注。为此,本刊特地派出记者,就读案的起因、背景及其相关问题,采访了一些原告与被告和电影界的著名人士。受访者畅谈己见,各自的观点却相差千里,可谓公说公有理,婆说婆有理,究竟谁有理?现将采访内容笔录于此,相信广大读者自会有公正的评判。此外,为行文方便,被告三方分别简称为天都、摩达、中影音像,原告方简称为电影厂。
July 11, 1998, CCTV live broadcast of the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court hearing the trial of 10 Shanghai film studios v Beijing Tiandu movie copyright agency center, Tianjin TEDA audio-visual distribution center, in violation of the China Video Publishing House The process of copyright cases has aroused the fervent concern of all walks of life across the country. To this end, the magazine specially sent reporters, study the causes, background and related issues, interviewed a number of plaintiffs and defendants and film celebrities. Respondents talked about their own opinions, but their views are a thousand miles away, the public can be described as public, the woman is reasonable, who is justified? The interview is now recorded here, I believe the majority of readers will have a fair judgment. In addition, for the convenience of writing, the defendants were referred to as the Tripartite, Moda and Zhongyin Audio-Video, respectively, and the plaintiffs referred to as the Film Factory for short.