论文部分内容阅读
两位哲学博士、教授在本文中阐述了他们对于哲学与科学的关系问题的观点,并对“反哲学”以及尼基福罗夫的《哲学是科学吗?》一文发表了意见。哲学的社会意义及其真理性之谜,激起了公众的由衷兴趣.不管有哪些人,包括《哲学是科学吗?》一文的作者,如何反对、怀疑和嘲笑,哲学在当今世界上的社会作用只会提高,而不会降低。A.Л.尼基福罗夫对哲学的评价过于武断了,他说:“哲学从来不是,现在不是,相信将来也永远不是科学(马克思主义哲学也是如此)。”他坚定认为,哲学论断不受经验检验,也不会被经验驳倒。亚里士多德早就指出过,一些假想的哲学反对
The two philosophers and professors described their views on the relationship between philosophy and science in this article and expressed their opinions on “anti-philosophy” and Nikiforov’s article “philosophy is science?” The social significance of philosophy and the mystery of its truth aroused the public’s sincere interest.Whether there are people, including the author of “Philosophy is science? How to oppose, doubt and ridicule, the philosophy of philosophy in today’s world of society The effect will only increase, but will not decrease. A.Л. Nikiforov’s assessment of philosophy is too arbitrary. He said: ”Philosophy has never been, it is not, and it is never in the future that science (as Marxist philosophy does)." He firmly believes that the philosophical thesis does not Experienced test, it will not be refuted by experience. Aristotle pointed out long ago that some hypothetical philosophical objections