论文部分内容阅读
关于《荆楚岁时记》的一些基本问题,前人已有所论析。本文续加辨正稽考,认为其书由宗懔作于梁时荆州,本名《荆楚记》,是一部主要在地理撰述风气下产生的地理风俗文献,由于专记岁时,后称《荆楚岁时记》。但该书散佚较早,今传明万历间两种辑本的系统彼此不同,正文与注文混淆,不明出处,皆非全真。我们既可以举例论证今传本“似是而非”的条目,也可利用相关材料指证其他文献中包含的“似非而是”的佚文。
On the “Jing Chu Sui Chronicles” some of the basic issues that have been discussed before. This essay continues to emphasize the positive test, that his book by the Zong Zhen for the Liangshi Jingzhou, whose real name is “Jing Chu Ke”, is a geography custom mainly generated by geographical writing style literature, as a special record age, later known as “Jing Chu age book. ” However, when the book was loosely collected, the systems of the two versions of the Ming Dynasty were different from each other. The confusion of the text and the annotation, the unknown source, were not complete. We can give an example to demonstrate that the current version of the “plausible” entry can also be used to prove that the other documents contained in the “fair and false” of the Lost.