论文部分内容阅读
对事实进行选择、协调与编排,调查,推测,分类,评价,预测所形成的作品都是事实性作品。在事实性汇编作品的场合,如果作者对事实的选择、协调或编排具备最低限度的创造性,其应当获得版权保护;仅仅是对事实的调查本身不能够使该事实具有可版权性;分类本身只是不受版权保护的思想,对特定分类方法的表达则可能具有可版权性;事实之上如果添加了作者的评价因素,可能获得版权保护;国外多数法院认为,对未来事实的预测本身可以享有版权保护。我国的著作权法律制度中似乎只有著作权法实施条例第2条对作品的可版权性要件作了抽象的规定,对事实作品等典型和特殊类型的作品具体的可版权性的规定似乎尚属欠缺,有详加规定的需要。
The choice of facts, coordination and arrangement, investigation, speculation, classification, evaluation, prediction of the works formed are factual works. In the case of factual compilation, the author should have copyright protection if the author has the minimum of creativity in the choice, coordination or arrangement of facts; the mere factual investigation alone does not make the fact copyrighted; the classification itself is merely Without the idea of copyright protection, the expression of a particular classification method may be copyrighted; if the author’s factor of evaluation is added, the copyright may be protected; the majority of foreign courts believe that the prediction of future facts can itself enjoy copyright protection. It seems that only the copyright law section 2 of the Copyright Law of our country provides for the abstraction of the copyright copyrights of the works. There seems to be a lack of specific copyright-specific works of typical and special types such as factual works. Have detailed requirements.