论文部分内容阅读
法官解释权在司法实践中发挥着重要的作用。法官对法律解释坚持什么样的司法哲学将直接影响着法律适用的效果。我国的特殊国情无疑使这一问题更加复杂化。其实,司法能动与司法克制并不是一个非此即彼的问题,而是法官在进行自由裁量时享有多大的自由或者受到多大的限制的程度问题。二者在和谐社会和法治建设中发挥的功能各有千秋,法官有责任通过法律解释活动在司法能动与司法克制之间维持一种有益的平衡。
Judicial interpretations play an important role in judicial practice. Judges insist on the legal interpretation of what kind of judicial philosophy will have a direct impact on the effectiveness of the law. The special national conditions in our country undoubtedly make this issue even more complicated. Actually, judicial motivation and judicial restraint are not a non-consensual issue, but rather a question of how much the judges have to be free or subject to much restraint in their discretion. Both of them have their own functions in building a harmonious society and the rule of law. Judges have the responsibility to maintain a beneficial balance between judicial motivation and judicial restraint through legal interpretation activities.