论文部分内容阅读
高考中,给材料的议论作文盛行,如何根据材料,提出相应的论点呢?方法大致有二:1、中心立论。这是基本的方式。材料或篇或段,都有中心,可以根据这个中心,提炼论点。这又有几种情况;一是直接立论。其特点是就事论事,材料中心就是自论论点。这常见于评述性的议论文。〔材料〕美国学者迈克尔·帕伦蒂在所著《少数人的民主》中指出,美国的工业、交通、运输、教育、娱乐和文化机构都是有钱的人所控制,认为法律上冠冕堂皇规定的穷人与富人平等享有的政治自由权力实际上是幻想。毛主席在《新民主主义论》中说:“中国
In the college entrance examination, there is a prevalence of argumentation and composition of materials. How to make corresponding arguments based on the materials? There are roughly two methods: 1. The central theory. This is the basic way. There is a center for materials or articles or paragraphs. Based on this center, the arguments can be refined. This has several other situations; the first is direct argument. It is characterized by the fact that the material center is self-discipline. This is common in commentary arguments. [Material] The American scholar Michael Palenti pointed out in the book “The Democracy of a Few People” that the industrial, transportation, transportation, education, entertainment, and cultural institutions of the United States are controlled by wealthy people, arguing that they are legally stipulated. The political freedom enjoyed by the poor and the rich is virtually an illusion. Chairman Mao stated in the “New Democracy Theory”: "China