论文部分内容阅读
我国法学方法论的研究还处于萌芽,“类型化”是法学方法论的重要内容,当抽象——一般概念及其逻辑体系不足以掌握某生活现象或意义脉络的多样表现形态时,使用的补助思维形式就是“类型”。用“类型化”思维方式反观我国刑法典的规定,至少存在刑法的罪名取定缺乏彰显类型化之不足、类型与类型之间横向衔接不紧密、母类型纵向再类型化的过程中子类型要素存在差异、类型化过细的问题以及部分类型的开放性不够等五个方面的问题。
The study of legal methodology in our country is still in its infancy. The “typification” is an important part of jurisprudence methodology. When the abstraction-general concept and its logical system are not enough to grasp the diverse manifestations of a living phenomenon or meaning, the subsidies used The form of thinking is “type ”. In contrast with the “type” way of thinking of the provisions of our criminal code, there is at least the existence of criminal law, lack of conviction to underscore the lack of typeization, the type and type of horizontal convergence is not close, the type of vertical re-type of the parent process Different types and types of elements, the problem of too small types and the lack of openness of some types of problems.